VS

Cursor vs Windsurf: Which AI-Native IDE Should You Choose?

An in-depth comparison of Cursor and Windsurf AI IDEs. We analyze features, AI capabilities, pricing, and help you choose the best AI coding environment.

Verdict: Cursor for power users and multi-model needs, Windsurf for speed and free usage

Quick Comparison

Cursor

$20/month (Pro)

Best for

Developers who want the most mature AI IDE with multi-model support

Pros
  • Most established AI-native IDE
  • Excellent Composer for multi-file editing
  • Multiple AI models (GPT-4, Claude, etc.)
  • Strong VS Code compatibility
  • Active community and frequent updates
Cons
  • Can be resource-intensive
  • Learning curve for advanced features
  • Subscription required for best experience
  • Some VS Code extensions may not work
Visit Cursor

Windsurf

Free / $15/month (Pro)

Best for

Developers who want a fast, free AI IDE with strong autocomplete

Pros
  • Generous free tier
  • Extremely fast autocomplete
  • Lightweight and performant
  • Cascade for agentic coding
  • Good privacy options
Cons
  • Newer, less mature than Cursor
  • Smaller community
  • Fewer model options
  • Some advanced features still developing
Visit Windsurf

The AI IDE Battle: Cursor vs Windsurf

The AI-native IDE space is heating up. Cursor pioneered the category, but Windsurf (from Codeium) is emerging as a serious contender. Which should you choose?

TL;DR: Choose Cursor for mature AI features and model flexibility. Choose Windsurf for speed, free tier, and fast autocomplete.

The AI IDE Revolution

Both Cursor and Windsurf represent a new paradigm: AI-native IDEs where artificial intelligence isn't an afterthought but the core experience.

Cursor: The Pioneer

Cursor set the standard for AI IDEs:

  • Composer: Revolutionary multi-file editing with natural language
  • Tab completion: Context-aware suggestions
  • Chat: Deep codebase understanding
  • Cmd+K: Inline code generation

Windsurf: The Challenger

Windsurf brings Codeium's AI expertise to a full IDE:

  • Cascade: Agentic coding with autonomous actions
  • Supercomplete: Predictive, multi-line completions
  • Command: Natural language code editing
  • Flows: Automated coding workflows

Feature Comparison

FeatureCursorWindsurf
Multi-file editing⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Composer)⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Cascade)
Autocomplete speed⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Model selection⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Free tier⭐⭐ (limited)⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Resource usage⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Maturity⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Privacy options⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Enterprise ready⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Pricing Breakdown

Cursor

PlanPriceFeatures
HobbyFree2000 completions, 50 slow requests
Pro$20/moUnlimited, fast requests, all models
Business$40/moTeam features, admin controls

Windsurf

PlanPriceFeatures
Free$0Generous autocomplete, basic features
Pro$15/moUnlimited everything, priority
EnterpriseCustomSecurity, compliance, support

When to Choose Cursor

Cursor is the right choice when you need:

  • Multiple AI models: Switch between GPT-4, Claude, and others
  • Mature tooling: Battle-tested with large community
  • Composer workflows: Complex multi-file refactoring
  • Maximum AI power: Best-in-class model access

When to Choose Windsurf

Windsurf makes sense when you prioritize:

  • Speed: Fastest autocomplete in the market
  • Cost: Generous free tier, lower Pro price
  • Lightweight: Less resource consumption
  • Privacy: Strong local processing options

The Verdict

Both are excellent AI IDEs. Cursor leads in maturity and model flexibility. Windsurf excels in speed and value.

Our recommendation:

  • Power users: Cursor Pro
  • Budget-conscious: Windsurf Free/Pro
  • Speed-focused: Windsurf
  • Multi-model needs: Cursor
Pro tip: Idlen works with both Cursor and Windsurf. Earn passive income while coding in your AI IDE of choice. Get the extension →

Use both and earn money

Install Idlen and earn passive income while using Cursor, Windsurf, and other AI tools.

Frequently Asked Questions

Everything you need to know about Cursor vs Windsurf